Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Hugo Voljacques Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W L L
Form
W W W W W L W W W LH2H: Zandschulp 2 - 0 Voljacques
They have played 4 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Voljacques winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Voljacques was at the France F18 (Plaisir), 18-09-2018, First, I.hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 2 |
| Hugo Voljacques | 0 |
France F18 (Plaisir)(18-09-2018)
| Zandschulp | Stats | Voljacques |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (10-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 88 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 673 |
| 29 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (363-228) | Career Total W/L | 56% (165-129) |
| $3,456,920 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Voljacques H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Hugo Voljacques
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Hugo Voljacques
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Voljacques H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 12 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:0 | Average Match Time | 1:17:0 |
| 63% (64/102) | 1st Serve % | 65% (88/136) |
| 83% (53/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (56/88) |
| 53% (20/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (17/48) |
| 45% (9/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 46% (63/136) | Return Points Win % | 28% (29/102) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hugo Voljacques Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Hugo Voljacques
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
3
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
4
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Giovanni Oradini
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Yann Marti
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Hugo Voljacques
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Martin Breysach
63%
(
79 of
126)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
1
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
41%
(
52 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Marvin Moeller
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Titouan Droguet
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
4
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Jing Long Weng
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Noe Villen
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (363/228) | Win/Loss | 56% (165/129) |
| 58% (828/593) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (362/292) |
| 53% (7124/6299) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3248/2861) |
| 58% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (75/64) |
| 62% (170/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (15/17) |
| 66% (114/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (75/48) |
| 46% (11/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2892 | Aces Total | 743 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2142 | Total Double Faults | 685 |
| 1:35:39 | Average Match Time | 1:2:7 |
| 384.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.61 |
| 62% (24087/39122) | 1st Serve % | 57% (7153/12445) |
| 71% (17215/24087) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5070/7153) |
| 48% (7238/15038) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2465/5292) |
| 43% (1781/4127) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (537/1273) |
| 41% (16381/40296) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5100/12664) |
| 62% (32/20) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (26/27) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (66/65) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (72/42) | Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 70% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 56% (163/128) |
| 62% (336/539) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (164/291) |
| 51% (20/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (100/183) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (41/78) |
| 57% (112/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (36/70) |
| 89% (342/303) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (165/145) |
| 11% (342/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (165/20) |
| 24% (247/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (128/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
